pull down to refresh

Dude, you know me. Downzapping your accusation is not covering scamming up. This is the most bonkers interaction I've ever had on SN.

Making accusations about stealing needs to have a WAY higher bar than you are using.

101 sats \ 6 replies \ @Kruw 13 Sep

"Scamming" is the most generous interpretation of his actions, remember? #1566778

If he's causing people to lose their coins and profiting from it, that's bad.

If he's causing people to lose their coins and NOT profiting from it, that's even WORSE (since he can't refund their losses with his profits).

The more appropriate term for destroying user funds without profiting from it would be "terrorist", so calling him a "scammer" is me being nice to him.

reply

I don't agree at all. You have not presented anywhere close to sufficient evidence to support either claim.

reply

Why don't Justin's own words count as sufficient evidence?

reply

Because when I read those words I do not get that he is draining someone's wallet.

Whati read is you and him arguing about Ark and then Justin making a statement about Lightning as a part of that argument.

It reads to me like an argument, not theft. The burden is on the accuser (you) to prove the claim that he is actually trying to drain people's wallets. And you certainly haven't convinced me.

reply
And you certainly haven't convinced me.

Wrong, I already convinced you that funds can be drained from sleeping lightning wallets: #1569234

I am happy to explicitly acknowledge that keeping your lightning wallet online is important to prevent it from getting drained.
reply

"funds can be drained" does not equal "Justin is trying to drain wallets"

reply

We already tested Justin's honesty and proved he is intentionally causing the draining, remember? He refused to delete his Tweet with the malicious instructions: #1570012

reply