pull down to refresh

Let's get to business then

Have no interest in doing any business with any anon

Everyone is waiting for your answer

my answer?

but you don't seem to know.

ok, why am I responding to an anon again? Bye.

620 sats \ 14 replies \ @anon 14 Sep

Okay then, since you don't have an answer, you should apologize to @Kruw for insulting his intelligence because he didn't recognize these fictional "ethan, humpus" characters.

reply

Go on... tell me, where did I have insulted Kruw? And who are you? His/her mum?

He has demonstrated having zero intelligence, or at least is not using it properly, nor has he been respectful with others around here. Grow up, kid.

However, I still appreciate his work on the ~Coinjoin space. A valid alternative for those not familiar with ~lightning privacy capabilities.

reply
120 sats \ 12 replies \ @anon 14 Sep

Here's where you insulted Kruw:

Sounds to me you are just not well informed about ~lightning (otherwise you'd know who ethan, humpus are)

No one knows who "ethan, humpus" are, and you treated me like shit for asking you to tell me. Go ahead, inform everyone about your brilliant ~lightning insights about these two fabricated people.

reply
No one knows who "ethan, humpus" are

From the results of your poll, it looks like "No one" is just you.

You are just looking for hooks to argue with people. Haven't you better things to do, kid? Go play around, have fun.

Byyyye.

reply
620 sats \ 10 replies \ @anon 14 Sep

You started the argument that people who don't know about "ethan, humpus" are "not well informed" about lightning.

And suddenly you can't identify who these people are are when someone asks you? You are pathetic. After you got caught lying, you doubled down instead of apologizing to the expert you insulted.

reply
274 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek 14 Sep

I think they mean Hampus Sjösberg (Blixt) and Ethan Heilmann. No "Humpus".

@supratic You didn’t even know how to write his name lmao

@Kruw already mentioned Hampus in #1570171. Maybe there’s also no Ethan, but it’s Evan.

But surely @supratic already knows, he just doesn’t want to show people how smart he is because he’s too humble.

reply
620 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 14 Sep

No, @supratic was not referring to Hampus Sjosberg, @Kruw specifically mentioned him: #1570171

I know "Evan" and "Hampus" are maintainers of Lightning wallets, but that doesn't have anything to do with Justin's scamming, does it?

Also, Ethan Heilman's webpage doesn't seem to mention lightning at all, so it's not him either.

reply
2567 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 14 Sep

Edited my comment while you were replying again 🙈

@supratic only knows fictional people

"Ethan, humpus" came straight from previous @optimism's comment #1570156 I liked it and I thought it was fun that he was giving clues without pointing to the solution. So I used it to doubt @Kruw's ~lightning knowledge. That's it. I'm glad you connected the dots. You see, you can do it if you want, it just need some research effort. Bravo.

reply
422 sats \ 0 replies \ @Kruw 14 Sep
That's it. I'm glad you connected the dots. You see, you can do it if you want, it just need some research effort. Bravo.

The word you are looking for is "sorry". I'll accept an apology from you now since you admitted that you were lying the entire time.

102 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 14 Sep

You pretended to know, you pretend to know now, and you will pretend to know as long as your nym exists

357 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 14 Sep
Have no interest in doing any business with any anon

Would you tell me then? I also don’t know who is Ethan and Humpus and I would like to know from you. You seem very knowledgeable.

reply

Oh, here you are. I should have known it was you from the beginning lol

reply
357 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 14 Sep

It wasn’t.

I think you should make a post about Ethan and Humpus to let everyone know how smart you are for knowing two people who afaik don’t even exist.

reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 14 Sep

deleted post

reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 14 Sep

deleted by author