pull down to refresh

161 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 15 Sep \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon

that's the wrong question, imho. I brought this up last time too.

There are 2 solutions to this:

  1. SN change
  2. Stacker behavior change

Every single time, stackers call for k00b to do something. But, that is even weaker sauce than the weak sauce of actual bitcoiners being so degenerate that they need handouts.

write
compose
398 sats \ 2 replies \ @Natalia 15 Sep

Hmmmm, SN can change the algo; Stackers' behavior could change too, but most stackers' behavior mostly affected by the rewards from what I observed, you remember how draining it was during the mad march thing?

reply
225 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 15 Sep

No, because I was a lurker back then.

If stacker's behavior is most affected by rewards (plausible) then we need more chads and less losers.

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @supratic 16 Sep -125 sats

past not gonna come back, it never did. would you like to see real https://stasher.news/transparency? shame it works with different currency

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @supratic 16 Sep

The other option is to make the reward distribution public, so stackers will know who is providing value and who are the assmilkers suckers.

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @supratic 15 Sep

remove the rewards, problem solved.

reply