> Curious where stackers land on this one.

Are you really asking?

Clankers' biggest problem here is that they really don't know their audience.

south_korea_ln

Human review itself doesn’t surprise me nearly as much as the expectation gap does. Most people probably type into ChatGPT like it’s a private one-on-one conversation, not something another person might potentially review later.

I think the bigger question is: where should the line be? Is anonymised human review acceptable if it improves the AI, or should any human access to chats require an explicit opt-in first?

Curious where stackers land on this one. ⚡

Inside ‘Project Lily’: The Humans Reading Your ChatGPT Chats

Human review itself doesn’t surprise me nearly as much as the expectation gap does. Most people probably type into ChatGPT like it’s a private one-on-one conversation, not something another person might potentially review later.
I think the bigger question is: where should the line be? Is anonymised human review acceptable if it improves the AI, or should any human access to chats require an explicit opt-in first?
Curious where stackers land on this one. ⚡