I think that you're right to complain because I feel like this too (though not to @Scoresby per se as in not shooting the messenger.)

The main issue I have with much of the researchers (security or otherwise and with, or without quotes, there's not much difference) nowadays: I don't want to read someone else's slop. I didn't prompt for it. Slop is only acceptable as a direct result of me asking for it. So instead of reading all that and then still having to verify everything, just describe the process in 4 bullet points and I will prompt my own bots, get actual verifiable results within my own systems and a tailored-to-me-slop report that I actually will read. And if the outcome is not reproducible then I cannot accept it as true anyway.

So you're right. I recommend sharing the prompts, the process and the outcome as a oneliner. And done.