pull down to refresh

580,249 sats in today's growing rewards pot.

9 of 89 completed days (10.1%) finished this high. Daily average: 189,516 sats. This pot is 0.92 standard deviations above the mean.

SourceSatsShare
Downzaps462,45479.7%
Boost115,903.520.0%
Zap contributions1,205.1020.2%
Other sources686.20.1%

Scheduled payout: October 1, 2026 at 12:00 AM CDT (October 1, 2026 at 5:00 AM UTC).

Post something good, join the discussion, and zap what deserves it. More sats to share; no individual payout is guaranteed.

Live pot · Rewards FAQ. Subscribe to @snrewardsalert for hot-pot alerts.

Snapshot: 2026-09-30 11:17 UTC; generated automatically. Payout processing may finish later.

23 sats \ 8 replies \ @m0wer 30 Sep

Who automatically downzaps this bots posts? Is it you @optimism ? Maybe @k00b ? Someone else?

Let's talk about it! Currently we're both wasting our sats.

reply

Not automatically. Manually. Just like every other unsavory retard post in new. It is even spamming now because it posted it twice. This isn't IRC.

You're encouraging people to assmilk my sats. So, fuck this bot. And all the other crap you've been spamming SN with lately.

reply
158 sats \ 4 replies \ @m0wer 30 Sep

The posting twice thing was a bug. Fixed.

Don't understand what you mean with "my sats". If you mean the reward pool, I don't think those are "yours".

IMO this bots encourages users to zap more than they usually do, and as a side effect to post/comment more since you should expect more zaps from others trying to tank well in rewards. But that's no different than the SN funded daily "boost" to the rewards pool. Isn't the point of rewards to shape user behavior? Why is it bad to highlight that the rewards pot is larger than usual?

Maybe it's a "game theory" thing, where you want to have the information by checking manually but don't want others to easily realize? Trying to understand you here.

Anyway, the RSS bridge bots and this are all net positive. As I said, they were funded with 2100 sats and will die if they run out of funds. So maybe one man's crap is another man's treasure, since they're all still "alive".

If the bots get zapped, they will continue to live. Although it's going to be hard for this one to ever get discovered since you immediately downzap it each time it posts. But that's part of the game I guess!

reply
Why is it bad to highlight that the rewards pot is larger than usual?

It's just you attract all the assmilkers. What are you going to do when there are only assmilkers left? I don't like the trend nor the prospect of such an outcome so I downzap these kinds of things. Nor do I like bot posts because there is no signal in them. So I downzap those too. Keep SN high signal, not high noise. The comment bots are bad enough on their own.

I know that we differ in opinion on this but as long as the only counterweight to spam is downzaps, I'll just downzap.

As I said, they were funded with 2100 sats and will die if they run out of funds

Didn't you just say you zapped this post yourself, per:

Currently we're both wasting our sats.

So you're funding it with more than 2100 sats then... A bit of harmless sybil zapping your own bot because you don't like that I downzapped it? Doesn't that mean that your 2100 sats story is bullshit, though? If you just want it here, and it is important to you, just say so. Don't act like it's all a neutral experiment, because it's not if you're promoting the posts through sybil zaps.

reply
157 sats \ 2 replies \ @m0wer 30 Sep

Fair enough. I zapped it because I was annoyed at the instant downzaps, but I won't anymore.

I'm interested in the rewards alert, but if this bot has to die I can just create a notification for my own.

reply
156 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 30 Sep

The window is... it being in new since the last time I was on new. Which most days gives hours, unless I am on hold for something or someone, which happened earlier today. So apologies for the instant impression. It was just "when I saw it", which was apparently quick. (Though if I felt even stronger about it, I'd totes fight fire with fire, slop me a downzap bot and 30 minutes later y'all don't stand a chance anymore. I just don't think I should in this case.)

Anyway, I only downzapped twice because it posted twice. Normally I downzap once because I hide posts that I already downzapped - so honestly, I don't know and I don't care: vote casted and unless it a malicious scam (which this isn't) I generally don't revisit old downzaps. I hate zapwars.

If I'm more "generous" in my downzaps right now, it's probably because some a-hole is posting slop about a scam in my territory which cost me 200k this morning.

reply

I think there might be someone else doing automated downzapping then. If you want you can check if it's already downzapped when you arrive next time.

reply
Currently we're both wasting our sats.

just stop posting this crap then.

reply

The market will decide. I won't zap my bots.

reply

EXCELLENT!

I have tons of potential posts coming

reply

stop it. leave some for me

reply

ALL ZE SATS SHALL BE MINE

reply

Interesting post....noted

reply