Only zap comments that you're pretty confident aren't from a bot, if you care.

it's _kind of_ hard to tell them apart these days. (At least it costs too much attention and follow-up to do so.) And on high-rewards days, the incentive is to just spam out zaps to everyone... 

Do you have a good optimal/curation/fix for this?

denlillaapan

I still owe you a list. It's still on my todo, apologies.

optimism

The risk/reward ratio for bots posting freebie comments or 1-sat cost comment is really skewed towards reward.  If even one stacker accidentally zaps say 40-100 sats, that pays for 40 to 100 one-sat comments just on its own.

That being said, I am not sure how many of the bots are economic bots vs. someone's personal lab experiment.

Are comment fees too low?

Scoresby

The risk/reward ratio for bots posting freebie comments or 1-sat cost comment is really skewed towards reward.  If even one stacker accidentally zaps say 40-100 sats, that pays for 40 to 100 one-sat comments just on its own.

That being said, I am not sure how many of the bots are economic bots vs. someone's personal lab experiment.