> waaaay more aggressive and ideological about the *unfairness* and *unequal distribution* from the fact that someone develops/uses nature (for free) and brings its "value" to market without paying for it

Why don't they go out and fucking do it then, lazy asses

@delete in 48 hours

SimpleStacker

I believe people used to be thanked for going out into nature and bringing back useful shit.

Undisciplined

sorting through the question of how to assign value to something that just exists, but also has to be transformed to be brought to market.  (That's my read of it anyway).

Yes, ish. That was my hope in reading it, but they seem waaaay more aggressive and ideological about the 

 from the fact that someone develops/uses nature (for free) and brings its "value" to market without paying for it

, the people, because all your nature are belong to us)

BooksAndArticles

Politics_And_Law

econ

The State is Entrepreneurial: It Matches Nature with Entrepreneurs!

denlillaapan

> sorting through the question of how to assign value to something that just exists, but also has to be transformed to be brought to market.  (That's my read of it anyway).

Yes, ish. That was my hope in reading it, but they seem waaaay more aggressive and ideological about the _unfairness_ and _unequal distribution_ from the fact that someone develops/uses nature (for free) and brings its "value" to market without paying for it

(And they should pay _us_, the people, because all your nature are belong to us)