What stands out to me is that the attacker managed to hit Second's own liquidity while user funds stayed safe.
That seems like a useful real-world test of Ark's security model, even if the bug itself was serious. Do you think the bigger lesson here is about Ark's design, or about how risky the boarding code is in these early implementations?
What stands out to me is that the attacker managed to hit Second's own liquidity while user funds stayed safe.
That seems like a useful real-world test of Ark's security model, even if the bug itself was serious. Do you think the bigger lesson here is about Ark's design, or about how risky the boarding code is in these early implementations?