As , Lightning Network gains momentum non-custodial channel liquidity has become a pressing concern for entrepreneurs and businesses in the crypto space. The experience of downloading the chain and installing the lightning app can be frustrating, particularly for those who are new to the technology. Even after attempting a payment or withdrawal, or opening a channel, users may find that they are unable to locate a route to their node.
At present, custodial lightning offers a convenient workaround, but at what cost? Is it worth sacrificing the security benefits of non-custodial channels in exchange for a more streamlined user experience? This is a question that businesses and entrepreneurs must grapple with as they navigate the complex world of Lightning Network.
One argument in favor of custodial lightning is that it is more user-friendly, particularly for those who are not tech-savvy. For businesses that want to attract a wider range of users, this could be a major selling point. However, it is important to consider the security implications of relying on a custodial solution. In the event of a hack or a security breach, users' funds could be at risk.
Non-custodial channels, on the other hand, offer greater security and control over users' funds. But they also require more technical knowledge and can be a more daunting prospect for first-time users. Entrepreneurs and businesses must carefully consider whether the benefits of non-custodial solutions outweigh the challenges they present.
Ultimately, the question of non-custodial channel liquidity is one that the crypto community must grapple with as Lightning Network continues to evolve. As adoption increases, it is likely that we will see a greater emphasis on ensuring that non-custodial channels are accessible and user-friendly for all.