0 sats \ 2 replies \ @faithandcredit 23 Apr 2023 \ on: Daily discussion thread
I prefer nuclear war over traditonal war. Because with Nuclear war i asume it over faster but the end result is a similar kind of destruction. For example look at Berlin after WW2, it looked like it practially had been nuked. So whats the differene? Most nukes have a blast radious of less than 5km afaik. If nuclear war breaks out, you have to be really unlucky to be hit by one. These blast radiuses also need perfect flat terrain, its possible that the neibourough structure, house or hill will absorb the blast and ur property will be fine. Just trying to be optimistic.
u can simulate nuclear attack with different nukes and locations using this website... https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/
reply
look at Berlin after WW2, it looked like it practially had been nuked
"About 30% of Berlin's surface was destroyed during the WW2. In the case of Warsaw, however, estimates indicate that between 80-90% of the city was destroyed."
How funny is to make an example of 30% destroyed capital of invader who started the whole mess,
instead of at least 80% destroyed capital of Poland, the biggest victim of those German barbarian invaders.
So, Warsaw looked like it practially had been nuked, and Berlin was in much better condition.
reply