112 sats \ 2 replies \ @thrown 27 Apr 2023 \ parent \ on: Groundbreaking Solution to BTC<>Sats Denomination Problem Implemented. bitcoin
seems like this is a good middle ground though. people that use BTC won’t be confused as to what they’re using and people that use Sats won’t be inconvenienced by seeing a little 0. in front, right?
write
preview
33 sats \ 1 reply \ @kr 27 Apr 2023
yeah i think it makes sense.
it’s a bit of a turn off for consumers to see their wealth measured with a 0 followed by a decimal place though, unit bias is real.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @thrown 28 Apr 2023
the smallest decimal place will realistically be worth $1 in the next 10 years, so they just gotta deal with that haha
reply