Over time the block subsidy will be almost zero, so this is expected.
Transaction fees will become larger than block subsidy more and more in the future.
This is all part of the design of Bitcoin since genesis.
reply
So people are bidding up fees to move files around on a secondary market and people think this is an achievement? We all saw what happened to ICOs, DEFI tokens and NFTs on other chains activity eventually dies off and so will this, and many getting suckered into it now will get rekt
reply
As noted in the responses, there was at least one block on 2017-12-22 that also had transaction fees greater than the block subsidy due to fee market conditions (as opposed to e.g. transactions with excessive fees due to mistakes). That was during a crazy bull run, though.
The first block to ever have had transaction fees greater than the block subsidy was block 157077 in 2011, with total fees of ‎85.974 BTC and a subsidy of 50 BTC. The block included two related transactions, each with a fee of exactly 2**32 sat, or 42.94967296 BTC, which makes me think there may have been a 32-bit integer overflow when calculating the sum of inputs, and the intended fee was zero (zero fee was common back then). That was only about 240 USD in total back then, though, so not the most expensive mistake in Bitcoin history by any means.
reply
Does any1 know where the spam is coming from? No hate just curious.
reply
Ordinals and monkey pics.
And we're not allowed to complain aboitnit because its not " inclusive" of the eth fanbois if you do
reply
BRC-20 and SRC-20 token minting and trading
reply
An people wonder how miners are going to profit after the next halving.
reply
but cmon this fee rate is not sustainable 🤔 at least not before we have channelfactories and other tech to make channels cheaper to open
reply