Unfortunately, I’m pretty sure this wouldn’t work as well as you think. It would make your poll results less trustworthy - people would spin up fake accounts just to get 50 sats (it happens with invite links all the time).
(it happens with invite links all the time)
care to elaborate?
reply
Invite links are faucets and when they're shared indiscriminately, they get drained. A handful of folks have shared them in public chat groups or on twitter and 5-10% end up being legit people and the rest go to somebody draining them with disposable email addresses.
reply
Ahh, I see. Didn't think of publicly posting invite links with sats attached. Guess that was too obvious for me, haha
reply
Exactly if you've practiced thinking adversarially its pretty obvious, but most people don't think that way (at least in a tech context).
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 10 May 2023
Honestly, I am not sure if I would not be the one draining the sats, haha
reply
lol yeah the best adversarial thinkers are borderline adversaries themselves. A friend from college was into infosec and always scheming.
reply
That's fair. I guess it would have to be more complex than I am thinking.
reply