pull down to refresh

So,,.... looks like there's some more things to look into though:

Impervious is a spook browser of the first order. Enjoy.
view on twitter.com

Then read this thread:

Thread by @GhostOfNakadai on Thread Reader App https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1510325379004866564.html

But, of course, none of that really matters, if this is ends up becoming true:

Incorrect, open source on release.
view on twitter.com
reply

Does this mean open source like MIT or open source like Umbrel?

reply

Like Umbrel, it's not FOSS.

reply

well that's no bueno

reply

Why do you say that? Do you intend on actually modifying the source code?

reply

It doesn't matter if he does or doesn't. FOSS is core to the ethos of Bitcoin. Anyone should be free to do whatever they want with the software, even if that means they can build their own business from it.

The best analogy I've come up with is relating it to censoring transactions. Even if you knew your transactions wouldn't be censored, you wouldn't be okay with a miner that chose to censor other's transactions.

So even if you wouldn't modify the code yourself, you shouldn't be okay with having the freedom of others bring limited from doing so who could.

reply

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author

deleted by author