I might've missed context, but it doesn't sound to me like he's arguing R or K is better - merely that they both exist as strategies.
Backwards compatibility is usually the right move unless it prevents the project from achieving its goal. Just like Bitcoin has and likely will need to hard fork, nostr might too. It seems to me nostr has bigger fish to fry than reworking the encoding but what do I know.
Not the same but a great potential improvement with backwards compatibility: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/nip93-nson/93.md
reply
You're probably right about him not arguing about which one is better. I've read the note again and I think he's just using it as an analogy to make a point. Analogies are never 100% perfect...
reply