I support hard forks where we do nothing but they fork away
reply
+2 (fork off and...) ;)
reply
This is a scam and whatever application they’re running has no real integration with Bitcoin. The tweet says they wrote uniswap’s bytecode to the Bitcoin blockchain as an inscription, as if that would mean anything on Bitcoin… If that’s not a red flag then I don’t know what is.
If you need any more assurances it’s a scam, after digging through their websites (trustless.market, trustlessfaucet.io, and trustless.computer) I was able to find their Github organization (https://github.com/trustlesscomputer) and took a look through their “tc-sdk” (https://github.com/TrustlessComputer/tc-sdk)
Their wallet sdk “signs” a transaction by making a web request to “trustlesswallet.io” with query parameter “function” that’s set to the value “sign”.
Don’t even get me started on their “bitcoin” folder which is just a clone of https://github.com/generative-xyz/generative-sdk/tree/main/src/bitcoin
reply
It's amusing to me that all of this stuff is happening using only simple social conensus. There's no distributed sidechains or fancy cryptography. Turns out all you needed was just a solid base layer for ordering (Bitcoin) and a simple set of rules that spark a new network effect.
reply
There will be no consensus for hard fork. Besides, restricting some usage does not require hard fork, it can be achieved with soft fork. But I don't think there will be enough consensus even for that.
reply
Please be careful of this. It could be a scam. Im certainly sensing some red flags.
  1. Anon SN user
  2. The URL in the tweet has a sketchy name
  3. ???
  4. ...
reply
These BRC-20 tokens have nothing to do with the recently famous BRC-20 tokens such as Pepe. It's a totally different scam.
reply
Sounds scary, tbh.
reply