There is a vocal percentage of Bitcoiners who are against speedy trial and that ran UASF clients during taproot. But remember, even though the average person didn't know a lot about taproot, they felt as though they were informed.

For most people, CTV came out of nowhere. They hadn't heard or read anything about it (not even a cartoon picture with its name on it like lol) so to those people, some dev was trying to pull a fast one. Andreas Antonopoulos when explaining why it was such a big deal, speculated on some things that it might do (because he hadn't read the BIP yet) and used those examples to say "so those things that we don't know yet are why we need more time to review it". His speculative examples, like that it might be recursive (it isn't) are the examples people use to misrepresent it and that's why I think he's actually the source of those misrepresentations.

So what I'm trying to do now is get the community to the point that it feels educated on the subject matter.

Why didn't I cover other proposals. Well for one I don't know about them lol. I'm focusing on how they apply to channel factories and with as little speculation as I can, tbdxxx and the sources I've linked are what I found on those subjects so far.