pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @kilianbuhn OP 14 Apr 2022 \ parent \ on: Do we need protocol level Coinjoin? bitcoin
Have you read my post? Or only get angry after reading the headline?
I only want to require multi input/output transactions for transactions younger than 20 min. This wouldn't sabotage second layer solutions, nor any coinjoins wallets.
Only incentive for coinjoins. No hard fork.
I am not angry.
Those who use CJ already incentivized to so something for privacy. You actually propose to tax everybody else. And another thing, less obvious, CJ needs coordination of participants so it is supposed to be overlay protocol, always. This is what I said about, it would be better for everybody to keep base layer lean.
reply