280 sats \ 6 replies \ @Lumor 30 Jun 2023 \ on: Let's hear your controversial Bitcoin take. I'll go first: bitcoin
We should let miners steal sats that haven't moved for 100 years. Only in smaller amounts though, maintaining the block subsidy at whatever point in time we realize it's a good idea.
Probably after I'm dead.
This is simply wrong and you are too lazy to do the work to understand it. You do not have the agency to even declare this as "opinion", it is simply noise from an automaton.
reply
We could pretend that the consensus rules always included this after 100 years. Not to cause inflation but rather to maintain the money supply regardless of human error.
Love you too. 😆
reply
bitcoin doesn't need a money supply. one bitcoin is more than enough for the whole planet.
reply
Sure, I'm just fond of economic stability and less ugly workarounds.
The ability to add layers is fine, but I'd prefer we don't make it technically harder to own a direct piece of layer 1.
reply
economic stability doesn't come from a currency, it comes from the resilience and interdependence of the communities in question.
reply
Economic instability can come from currencies.
reply