pull down to refresh

it's not hating to point out objectively bad decision making

For all his free speech talk, he sure does seem to want people paying for it

oh and attach all our personal information to our speech too

You know you're paying for every post/comment you make on SN, right? Nothing wrong with charging people for the platform he provides.

reply

Yea, but SN is value for value. Twitter wants you to pay, but they don’t give something back. It’s a one way street.

reply

deleted by author

reply

It's not the payment necessarily that's the issue. I see how my original reply sounds that way, apologies.

It's the "for the people" branding while creating new problems to "solve" so he can essentially force people into what he wants that's not a good look.

If Twitter needs more revenue and payment is the only way that's gonna cut it, fine, just make it about that and not about something disingenuous

And on top of that, blocking public access to Tweets without an account is a TERRIBLE idea, especially if free speech really is his goal.

reply

deleted by author

yes, paying to post, but not to consume. very different.

reply

deleted by author

you do know if you stand in a public square screaming, everyone knows who you are....

reply

they can see you, and may be able to point you out in a line-up. but do they know who you are?

reply

unless you're wearing a mask

reply

deleted by author