it's not hating to point out objectively bad decision making
For all his free speech talk, he sure does seem to want people paying for it
oh and attach all our personal information to our speech too
You know you're paying for every post/comment you make on SN, right? Nothing wrong with charging people for the platform he provides.
reply
Yea, but SN is value for value. Twitter wants you to pay, but they don’t give something back. It’s a one way street.
reply
deleted by author
reply
It's not the payment necessarily that's the issue. I see how my original reply sounds that way, apologies.
It's the "for the people" branding while creating new problems to "solve" so he can essentially force people into what he wants that's not a good look.
If Twitter needs more revenue and payment is the only way that's gonna cut it, fine, just make it about that and not about something disingenuous
And on top of that, blocking public access to Tweets without an account is a TERRIBLE idea, especially if free speech really is his goal.
reply
deleted by author
reply
yes, paying to post, but not to consume. very different.
reply
deleted by author
reply
you do know if you stand in a public square screaming, everyone knows who you are....
reply
they can see you, and may be able to point you out in a line-up. but do they know who you are?
reply
deleted by author
reply
unless you're wearing a mask
reply