IME the Whirlpool desktop client is mandatory if you want your coins to remix. Your first mix is given priority in the system, subsequent mixes are not, and the mobile app does a poor job of registering coins for remixing.
Also, there's different tiers of pools, each that break up your coins into a certain fixed amount. I find that having a lot of tiny amounts is hard to manage, so I prefer the larger tiers.
The article also does not mention the 'doxxic' change that is produced from the initial mix, which I think is also important to consider.
Whirlpool bitcoin mixing breaks deterministic links to past transactions and provides forward-looking anonymity. This article demonstrates the easiest way to Whirlpool your bitcoin so that you can take steps to preserve the censorship-resistant and permissionless attributes of Bitcoin.
Some of the privacy-enhancing tools built into Samourai Wallet include:
Whirlpool, a zero-link CoinJoin implementation
BIP47, a reusable payment code protocol
PayNyms, unique identifiers that can be used to connect with peers for collaborative transactions
Stonewall, a post-mix spending tool that breaks on-chain heuristics
Stonewallx2, a post-mix spending tool that looks identical to Stonewall on-chain but is actually made with two peers
Stowaway, a post-mix spending tool that obfuscates the amount being spent
Ricochet, a post-mix spending tool that adds additional hops between the final payment destination
Advanced coin control
Separate wallets for deposit, pre-mix and post-mix bitcoin
Here's the Tweet kicking off the (long) Twitter thread announcing this article and describing Whirlpool further:
1/25 #Bitcoin on-chain privacy is becoming increasingly important as govts trend toward tyranny, as money gets weaponized, and as data breaches become more targeted.
IME the Whirlpool desktop client is mandatory if you want your coins to remix. Your first mix is given priority in the system, subsequent mixes are not, and the mobile app does a poor job of registering coins for remixing.
Also, there's different tiers of pools, each that break up your coins into a certain fixed amount. I find that having a lot of tiny amounts is hard to manage, so I prefer the larger tiers.
The article also does not mention the 'doxxic' change that is produced from the initial mix, which I think is also important to consider.
There is a cool bitcoiner guide located here: https://bitcoiner.guide/whirlpool/
deleted by author
Here's the Tweet kicking off the (long) Twitter thread announcing this article and describing Whirlpool further:
view on twitter.comFollowing is the full Twitter thread, unrolled.
Thread by @econoalchemist on Thread Reader App https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1515442405129949185.html
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author