That it's perfect. It's not. It is just substantially better than any other option.
we wouldn't need consensus if btc was perfect
reply
Wrong, fool! It is mathematical perfect, and this is known by the laws of physics. Difficulty adjusted proof-of-work is the absolute zenith of efficiency. You are operating in metaphor fantasy land where magic things better than the supremum exist, but join the real world instead of trying to be a midwit intellectual with your "moderate" position.
reply
deleted by author
reply
inb4, your only other comment... is linking to something you wrote 🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡
reply
deleted by author
reply
No, I'm just not retarded, but have a nice and meaningless life devoid of curiosity, consoooomer
reply
deleted by author
reply
I'll admit it was unnecessary and counterproductive to phrase things aggressively/arrogantly in my original response. ...I suppose the fiat world simply has me on edge more often than not, and it is a habit that I find I do need to work to keep in check around customers, colleagues, and employees.
reply
Bro you really need to get a girlfriend, or boyfriend or whatever suits you and makes you happy. Bashing on people doesn't move anything or anyone forward, specially you.
reply
Do I seem to you like a man who seeks to be pacified?
reply
You think the issuance schedule is perfect? I don't but it's good enough.
reply
Nope, it is unknowable what a "perfect" schedule would mean.
What is clear however is that every form of issuance sucks. The only good distribution you get is the one that arises out of capitalism, which requires repeated iterations, quite possibly a century or more may be needed until there is a rather sound distribution as I wrote about here: https://heaviside.substack.com/p/210-years-of-darkness-on-bitcoin
reply