Why would I bother trying to change the mind of someone who doesn't look at the facts? I've already showed you the verifiable failures of custodians that can only be solved by self-custody, and your response was that it was a point of view not built on adequate grounds.

Actually, you weren't even nuanced about it. You just kept parroting "dogma dogma dogma" over and over again. I was the one who had to break everything down.