And a troll.
I wouldn't refer to him as "left" but "authoritarian". Liking to use the plural personal pronoun, talking about people shutting up. That's not left or right that's totalitarianism.
Yeah, when I first skimmed through his post I thought it must be a troll... but are there really enough people on StackerNews for people to bother trolling?
But these days it seems like a lot of people actually have beliefs that seem surreal.
reply
Trolls are of all shapes and sizes. Some of them are not polyamorous but rather monogamous, and enjoy to parasite and torture even just one single person who has triggered their happy bone.
reply
This is flattering you guys, I never thought I'd be called a troll for a real concern.
But well, to each their own, you can think whatever you want of me, it's your opinion after all, as this post s my opinion.
If you felt personally attacked, I suggest you guys read the disclaimer one more time, some people got it and understood it, you guys seem to not have get it.
reply
It's no freudian slip that you are acting like calling you a social parasite is a compiement, is it?
reply
It's no coincidence at all, I'm moking you. But again, let me make it crystal clear, I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST YOUR IDEAS, don't take it personally, as I said before. I'm against idiocy. And you and the other guy took it to a personal level, which for me means idiocy.
You both call me an statist, totalitarian and a communist and you both don't even know me, just read a post I wrote and thought I was a troll because you took it personally, but guess what, people think different than you, and it's within my freedoms to ask for rationality, childish behavior is not rationality.
And about the thing that nobody agrees with me, you could read the comments or see the sats that have been given to the post, that should be your measuring stick, again, I'm not here to be agreed with, I'm here to express my opinion as many others do. Your opinion is that I'm a statis pig, communist and a leftist, and although it's wrong, I'm ok with it because it's not true and confirms that there's idiocy within our community.
If you felt attacked, there's a disclaimer at the start of the post, but since you made itabout yourself, you can consider my comments (not the post) an attack directly to you, not your ideas, you could think that the earth is flat for all I care.
reply
Hey genius, you used the mere term carnivore as a pejorative. If you asked me if there are example of carnivores who are idiots, I would say yes, and the reason that is true is because there are individuals, it is not a COLLECTIVE. So flippantly saying "carnivore" pejoratively indicates 1) you don't understand the cognitive bias of collectivizing groups of individuals; 2) you are merely arrogant and haven't ever bothered reading much on biology or history (because as a supposed non-idiot, you would never otherwise make such a statement), so we can surmise that you are merely arrogant rather than and idiot through and through, but that in itself is a reflection of midwittery, at least with respect to some distribution, where you might still very well be ahead of normies.
Finally, an intelligent person recognizes there are still more intelligent people than them, and that to those people, one is an idiot. To Stephen Hawking, I would be an idiot and that does not bother me in the slightest. So then the way you express a single term, you end up coming across as a total twat -- and here's the thing, I'd even say most bitcoiners annoy me, often because they are idiots, but at the same time, I realize it is as absurd as being annoyed that a chimp cannot speak -- in the end, twats like you are worse because genuine idiocy cannot be helped, but your twattery is in effect an opt-in form of functional retardation. Capish?
reply
Exactly. Idiocy by definition is usually not a voluntary thing, it's more often culturally acquired (brainwashing) or biological (neural interconnection and synapse density).
Extremism is always an insult used by those who are proud of their mediocrity.
And yeah, I'm not taking it personally because it's the first category in this case, that leads to the second, which is one of the ways in which this frustration at stupidity is turned into an excuse to tittilate yourself with other people's discomfort, and thus the mark of a bully.
When I encounter bully behaviour IRL these days, I'm either, get the fuck away from the clique that will slavishly defend this dominator, or if they are the new one, sock them in the eye to remind them that we aren't everyday internet people here.
reply
No, I'm writing this for you to realise that either a) I see you, or b) you have some more things to learn. I'm ambivalent about which way it goes so I'm pushing the provocative side since you started in that vein.
reply
Wow, someone who thinks meat is unhealthy -- you are so bold and daring with your original and incisive views, perhaps you will be awarded a Piolet D'Or!
reply
Might be the wrong comment you are responding to. I literally have eaten nothing but pork crackling and chops in the last 48 hours aside from some energy drinks.
This is the only thing that is stopping an acute episode of chronic bronchoconstriction.
I am not even used to eating pork, but I am trying to recover from B1 deficiency and pork is the number one food, a mere 200g of chops give you a day's minimum average requirement. I was raised in a christian sect that follows jewish food rules. Raised on soybeans, eggs and milk.
Not a personal attack. You just won't find many people to agree with you here. Have fun!
reply