pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @llamabyte 31 Jul 2023 \ parent \ on: What's something bitcoiners do that HURTS adoption more than it helps? bitcoin
If no women ever use bitcoin it won't change the usefulness or use case for bitcoin.
Bitcoin no more needs women representation then it needs any other conceivable category.
It's neutral.
I get it, you want more women in bitcoin, but it's like saying Gold needs more women. It doesn't make sense. Gold is Gold. If you are interested in Gold an its properties you will be interested in it.
Bitcoin is bitcoin, if you like and need what it has to offer you will adopt it regardless of gender, or any other factor.
If no women ever adopt bitcoin, it will still be the best money out there. Women need Bitcoin.
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @proeu 31 Jul 2023
I get your argument. I'm arguing for representation that is public facing (i.e. media)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @llamabyte 31 Jul 2023
Let's think about this another way.
If all public representation of bitcoin was only women.
What benefit would be added to bitcoin ?
reply