pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @maths 1 Aug 2023 \ parent \ on: Apeing bitcoin with credit cards and personal loans - burn the bridges with fiat bitcoin
I watch a lot of sovereign individual court cases on YouTube. It’s a fascinating reality they live in.
I did it with over $30k AUD of creative GST filings back in 2008. They first sent me a bill claiming 75% additional on top of the entire set of filings, some 9 months or so worth.
I sent their funny bill back with some special red markings on it, received a bill saying that the bill had been set off, ie, written off, and then a letter a week later from the deputy chief of taxation saying it was not correctly set off, and I got a few of these new bills, which made only a reference to a previous bill, which the last edition of this bill said ZERO owed. Set Off.
So, yeah, you don't know what you are talking about. Sure I was unable to smack down a judge trying to extort me and steal my personal property (a motorcycle that I refused to register), but I made him sweat, an hour in chambers, before he comes out to read out a list of irrelevant cases like your "sovereign individual" stories.
By the way, what made the judge sweat was me invoking the Statute of Monopolies 1624. A british law that is grandfathered into the constitution of the state I was living in (the first australian state, Queensland). I was probably one or two correct words away from being able to order full compensation for the damages they were causing me.
But there's sure as fuck no way I did not cancel a claim on my assets by the taxation office, and it used the Accepted For Value endorsement.
It made a 65K "debt" disappear.
It's like the OP says. THEY KNOW their money is fake, and unlawful by Equity jurisdiction. It is only valid as a statute, and that means, for a corporate employee. And they try to flip all that shit around, but we are the ones that are the rightful claimants to the Res of our statutory person registration.
None of the modern statutory law is Law by the standards of 200 years ago. It's all a sham that everyone has been lured into and they don't make it easy to disclaim their jurisdiction over us as superior officers of the corporation.
Do you think these pigs running this racket have any qualms about diluting the value of YOUR money to the point of impoverishing you? And are you really going to hurt any of your peers by making fiat money disappear back where it came from?
I would do this shit again, even, in the future, if I could figure out the angle for it. I just have zero credit rating so this topic is irrelevant to me, I can't get the money that way, but I can get it by tax filings. It's virtually the same thing. All of it is just about getting enough good people to be involved in it so they function as a cloak to protect the racket itself.
reply
Your interpretation of the Statute of Monopolies 1624 is not consistent with the general understanding of the law. The Statute of Monopolies was enacted in the United Kingdom, with the primary goal of limiting the power of monarchs to grant monopolies, except in certain cases. It marked the end of the monopolistic royal trading privileges in England and was instrumental in the development of the concept of a competitive market. Statute of Monopolies doesn't apply to the situation described in Queensland, Australia. While historical British laws have influenced Australian legal principles, the invocation of a 17th-century British statute in a contemporary Australian legal context is unconventional. The Statute of Monopolies cannot somehow affect claims on personal assets by taxation authorities or resolve debt. It is unrelated to taxation, debt enforcement, or registration of personal property.
reply
Did you generate that with GPT or what?
Do you even know what the statute of monopolies is? It was a prohibition against the Crown from issuing letters patent.
What do you think any government monopoly is?
They all have corporate registrations, just go look it up sometime at a registry. ALL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES ARE CORPORATIONS.
Government money is not real money, and they know it. It's just like the Continentals that were part of why the american colonies kicked out the british monarchy. It is a ponzi scheme they are using to syphon up our productivity, and it all ends up in the hands of the bankers and their corporate mates, that they spend at our expense.
No, I almost had these fuckers nailed between the eyes on this one. The judge even visibly looked stressed after I finished my argument presentation.
Also, just go dig up the Statute of Monopolies, hell gather together all of the Acts since the incorporation of british parliament, and then go look at the current Constitution of the state of Queensland. Known as the Brigalow Corporation. Also right there in the registry.
The constitution clearly states that all british law under which auspices this constitution was established, are all in force and continue to be in force, even if later law contradicts it.
reply
the guy is just a brainwashed statist slave, deep asleep in the matrix still. Let him pay his taxes and all the interest on his credit card and mortgage accounts until he starts to wake up a little bit.
Interesting to read your anecdote, bravo.
I also, would do this again as soon as possible. Working on getting the credit report restored, which would allow me to repeat. It's literally free "money" (credit) if you can understand some law and how banking and UCC work. This ridiculous world of debt instruments and corporate statutes.... Bitcoin hyperization can't come any sooner, it will be good riddance of this trash matrix these clowns created
reply
what does that have anything to do with this topic?
reply