Ok but if you have an open protocol, centralized entities are going to build on it. I get what you are saying but if they solve the zap integration problem (I don't know that they have, not sure why I can zap notes in their client but not damus) it's a net benefit.
Yes, poor wording on my part. It's not an integration problem, it was working seamlessly until the apple ruling. It's a getting around apple rules problem. So if zebedee somehow solved that it is a net benefit. I am not saying they did but you can definitely zap notes in their client.
reinventing the problem. custodial social media, no thanks.
Ok but if you have an open protocol, centralized entities are going to build on it. I get what you are saying but if they solve the zap integration problem (I don't know that they have, not sure why I can zap notes in their client but not damus) it's a net benefit.
of course centralized entities will build on nostr, it's our job to openly shun them.
there is no zap integration problem, there is an apple problem, stop using their products.
Yes, poor wording on my part. It's not an integration problem, it was working seamlessly until the apple ruling. It's a getting around apple rules problem. So if zebedee somehow solved that it is a net benefit. I am not saying they did but you can definitely zap notes in their client.