pull down to refresh

I've never understood why people are so enamoured with the Hughes quote, I think it actually doesn't help at all. See the last paragraph I wrote here: #166329
For me the key narrative that keeps getting missed is it's not really about what you might be ashamed of. It's about your personal security, which is to say it's ultimately about the power others may be able to exert over you. So think cameras in your driveway that a hacker/thief might use to know when they can safely rob your house, not cameras in your bathroom (both valid examples, but only one really matters).
I expand on the point about power in the above post.
The root of all power is the control of information, and the narrative justifying it. I haven't read the whole thing yet, but most of the first 15 or so of the "48 Laws of Power" by Robert Greene, these elements all hinge upon controlling perception and poisoning/restricting information flow. The Art of War by Sun Tzu also repeatedly dwells on the point of controlling perception - to seek to always appear the opposite to the real internal state, makes the enemy always step wrong.
This also brings up the whole game theory part of it, and that is why one of the key acts of a manipulator is to demand the victim become psychically naked using public confession. It creates a false sense of membership that the gullible normies don't even realise is motivating them.
I think that if you are in a position where you are justifying it to someone who is trying to exert power over you, you are already within the primary parts of the cage they are making for your mind. First rule of privacy is that none should know a secret that gives them control of property they have not honestly acquired.
reply