@siggy47 hitting the big time. I have 4 podcasts in my queue right now but I am moving this to the front of the line.
reply
great listen @siggy47
newcomers to SN should go read his article The Zen of Stacking Sats On Stacker News
reply
Just pressed play on the episode. I love this site, so of course, I appreciate Siggy's posts.
My favorite post of his is about Lou Perry Barlow, a lyricist of the Grateful Dead, early member of the cypherpunk movement and co-founder of the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation), a digital rights group. #189754
reply
It seems like the sats from this post should be forwarded to siggy lol
reply
yeah i forgot, but forwarded him half the sats on fountain
reply
Aaaaaaand today is when I realized @kr is Kevin Rooke lol
reply
Well done @siggy47 !
reply
Congratulaciones @siggy47
reply
This titles in this series make me laugh. "How I earned $150 online over the course of 2 years" like what could possibly be more boring and worthless use of time to listen
reply
$150 today $150,000 in 2035 just you watch! (In purchasing power terms)
reply
If that's what you believe then every hour on SN is thousands of future dollars wasted. You could do surveys or click farms that earn more than the median Stacker News user.
reply
The way I see it:
Before SN, people already shared stuff they care about online but earned $0 over the course of multiple years. Or maybe some actually pressed the donation buttons and went through all the hassle to buy the author a coffee so let's make it generous and say $10 per year.
With SN, it's now much much easier to get off zero. You can do the same thing as before but just link your article on SN (or just publish on SN) and get paid for it for basically zero costs to you (basically because of the 1 sat fee, lol).
So I think the $150 in 2 years is a lot since either @siggy47 would have done it anyway for $0 or - another big argument for SN - the SN model incentivized him to create this content in the first place.
reply
Look, no one is going to get rich on SN in 2023. I'm not sitting around thinking about how much wealth I'm accumulating here. I'm learning about bitcoin and having fun. Maybe I'm weird. Well, definitely, but I find this site fun. It's certainly not work. I'm retired. I also discovered that I like writing. I have gotten a lot of sats that way. No one can see into the future, but I'm sure our little stacks earned here will be worth a lot more in 5-10 years. Think about the guys who hung on to Gavin Andresen's faucet bitcoin. Also, SN is becoming a place to post long form content. Just check out the great articles that have been posted the past week or two. The site is evolving.
reply
Zaps are a user acquisition/BTC on-boarding gimmick that is most effective at converting users with a Bitcoin interest
The larger social graph of other platforms is more valuable to most people than the potential of getting tipped pennies a week in a currency they don't want for posting to a nice audience.
If a lot of people would "be here posting anyways", why do devs take on the enormous custodial risk?
I think zaps are useful as an input to a decentralized ranking algo, spam prevention etc. But putting bread on the table for a human engaging casually with social media? Its unfair to believe this is happening today.
reply
The larger social graph of other platforms doesn't translate to engagement for most. The larger social graph is valuable for browsing diversity, which can be recreated with a front page and APIs, thus the rush by platforms to build walls and capture third-party traffic.
Bitcoin is the hardest money on earth, and its directional trend is a one way street. Zaps are not airdrops. Zaps are not a gimmick to convert users. They're a tool for transparency. Entertaining as hell. An investment. They're a tool content creators will use to break the blockade of de-platforming, de-monetization, and ai pre-upload scanning that leverages licensing databases, language guidelines, expression algos, and other censorship flavors of the day pushed by the Party in power. Your call sign nullcount@Stacker.News is also a free LNURL wallet that's interoperable with the LN beyond the platform. Those FOSS themes "interoperable", "transparent", "composable", etc, are really starting to take off with the LN, as are LN self/hybrid-custody solutions that speak the language of the masses: tap, swipe, click. All this shit is so new though, Zaps is what, like 5 months old? Apple identified the threat and was quick to censor. SN itself has only existed in the keyframe of a bear market. I think horn gore and the flattening confidence curve of the LN and bitcoin at large will unleash holy hell. Bitcoin micropayments a gimmick? Seriously?
reply
I meant that people post content for free anyway. Like on these other platforms you mentioned.
You can just post a link here and start earning sats is all I wanted to say.
reply
You can also get back to work and buy sats with the fiat earnes, but that's not point... The novelty of free bitcoin wore off after my first thousand sats, and yet here I am...
reply
if you think it’s boring and worthless, don’t listen to it.
reply
Wondering why @nullcount is even on SN in the first place.
500k sats is not “$150” - it’s 2x global Sats per Capita
reply
The title makes me think this. But ok.
reply
Imo it's a good point you brought up (maybe just not in a very constructive manner) and needs to be discussed: #219125
reply
i’m all ears if you have a better title
reply
Alrighty then I got a spare hr or so whilst I do some stuff around the house. You've gained 1xlisten.
reply
reply
I got 69....... giggityyyy
reply