pull down to refresh
related posts
50 sats \ 2 replies \ @supertestnet 7 Aug 2023
this twitter thread contains my response: https://twitter.com/super_testnet/status/1688544017577824256
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @llamabyte 8 Aug 2023
they also don't mention that these exchanges btc <-> drive-tokens.They will not be frequent and will be relegated to interemediaries . They are not intended to be regular occurences, and are mostly for the side chain devs to start and secure their spot with real BTC, and those technicaly inclined andwilling to wait 3-6~ months. Most users will buy in and buy out using intermediaries with low time preference.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @llamabyte 8 Aug 2023
please cc @truthcoin on twitter, interesting analysis
...unless you are him *queu spooky music*
reply
20 sats \ 7 replies \ @llamabyte 8 Aug 2023
Am i mistaken or do they never actually explain how a sidechain change can impact main chain ?
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @l0k18 9 Aug 2023
Mainly that rule about the 256. It requires the miners to know about them and not allow more. Which is retarded.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @supertestnet 10 Aug 2023
I don't see why the 256 rule matters. If there are no more slots on the main chain, make more slots on an existing drivechain.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @llamabyte 9 Aug 2023
The 256 is a soft rule to put people like you at ease. It's a nice neat computerphile friendly multiple of 4 and fits in with the whole 32 bit theme of DC. I am sure it is completely arbitrary as is the 6 months downstream withdrawal limit which was also added to put neurotics at ease. If there is ever a need for more, that is if the market would ever actually find more than 256 unique uses for sidechains than more can be added.
The 256 is more for you than it is the network. It's a nice easy number to lube up virgin bitcoin maxi's.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @l0k18 9 Aug 2023
How much closer to straight up potty mouth are you going to take this guy?
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @llamabyte 10 Aug 2023
Depends on how much more you are going to hold back on sharing your technical and logical arguments against DC instead of just spilling them out, or if you don't have any stop taking silly pot shots accross my entire comment history that don't make sense.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @l0k18 10 Aug 2023
Why does DC have to be on bitcoin?
Why is DC better than a straight hard fork?
Simple questions, Should only take one sentence each.
view all 1 replies
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @l0k18 8 Aug 2023
there can only be 256!
https://imgs.search.brave.com/YLsd1r_hi_gKJPU_tyLbw5Nk-Xr_xQ6XldDPAA4DZ10/rs:fit:860:0:0/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly9tZWRp/YS5tYWtlYW1lbWUu/b3JnL2NyZWF0ZWQv/dGhlcmUtY2FuLWJl/LWpwb2pjaC5qcGc
Need to get a big stash of popcorn to watch the fights. The head must be removed!
reply
101 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 8 Aug 2023
deleted by author
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @oppongankrah 7 Aug 2023
Can someone kindly elaborate on BitMEX for me? Still a bit new to Bitcoin
reply
53 sats \ 0 replies \ @lightcoin_ 7 Aug 2023
BitMEX is a centralized, custodial exchange. They also have a research arm that publishes reports like this.
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @faithandcredit 7 Aug 2023
Bitmex started as a innovative exchange that allowed ppl to deposit btc and speculate on btcusd price with high leverage and good ux. Meaning you made more btc :) or lost btc. It was very popular AFAIK. It was also no kyc. But things have changed a bit :) today we take for granted the perpetual contract they pioneered and every exchange has one it seems and also allow to use btc as collateral. But once upon a time bitmex was the first and only ones that did that :p
reply