I have done this once but this is seriously bad ass. This is a great usage of this command!

Same!  It's a mind-blowing experience.  It just works.

It's even more magical if you use Magit for Emacs.  ;)

A few weeks ago, I used the command
```
$ git rebase --onto master local-dev <feature-branch>
```

for the first time and I felt like I ascended, lol

I used it to no longer keep untracked changes in my local repository (changes in `.next.config.js` and `.env.sample`). I created a `local-dev` branch and then create branches from that one.

And before I push, I run this command so my local changes are no longer included in the branch.

Basically, it goes from this:

```
A---B---C---F---G (master branch)               
         \                                        
          D---E---H---I (feature-branch) 
          ^
          (local-dev branch)
```

to this

```
A---B---C---F---G (master branch)               
         \       \                                       
          \       E'---H'---I' (feature-branch)
           \
            D
            ^
            (local-dev branch)
```

The abstractions could be better, but it's a lot like bitcoin in that its fundamental nature is pretty much irreducible given the requirements its designed to meet.

I understand git probably better than most people but I still mess up a lot of the time because I haven't spent enough time learning how to communicate with the merkle DAG.

I found this book really helpful if anyone is looking to go deep on git: 

https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2

tech

How do you feel about git?

The abstractions could be better, but it's a lot like bitcoin in that its fundamental nature is pretty much irreducible given the requirements its designed to meet.

I understand git probably better than most people but I still mess up a lot of the time because I haven't spent enough time learning how to communicate with the merkle DAG.

I found this book really helpful if anyone is looking to go deep on git: https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2