I don't have enough of knowledge to have opinion on OP_CTV.
But the one thing I would like to see is people do much better in the arguments. I like the one process recently also suggested by Jordan Peterson where if you want to argue against someone, you first have to restate their argument in a way that they will be happy with, i.e. it matches what they are trying to say. If and only if they are happy with your "restatement", then you can continue and provide your argument against.
The word I like for this is steel manning, ie the opposite of straw manning.
reply