pull down to refresh
128 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 28 Aug 2023 \ parent \ on: Daily discussion thread
$25 is 1% of $2500, so if anyone is billing more than $2500/mo this is a pretty good deal.
I think ideally they'd default to taking 1% (or even more) to attract plebs but when you begin to cross $2500 of invoicing for the month, recommend the $25/month option.
The other thing to consider is that it's not possible to split payments noncustodially in a single QR.
I'd guess they'll add more tiers eventually.
@zaprite
Yes, splitting on-chain payments in a single QR is not possible. Besides, we think the SaaS model is a more value-for-value approach.
reply
Yeah this makes sense. But I don’t think the 1% per transaction is offered yet.
With $2500 in sales who is the target market for this SasS? Hardcore BTC businesses getting $2500 in BTC revenues probably won’t use this.
And current businesses who don’t really care to accept BTC will probably just use open node. This is exactly what niftynei did to charge for her base58 course. Even she didn’t bother with BTC pay server
To charge $25 a month seems very expensive to accept Bitcoin payments easily.
I think zaprite should think about what made square so successful with allowing small business to accept credit cards on the street very easy. If square had this monthly flat fee for their services they would not be as successful as they are today.
reply