related posts
705 sats \ 2 replies \ @npub1freed0m 30 Aug 2023
I would like to think this is true - is there any way to verify if they are genuine zaps?
As I understand that zap receipts can be faked - and a post that has received nearly 1 BTC but only 5 likes and 1 comment seems somewhat unusual.
EDIT: It seems that possibly Primal are not validating the zaps. If you check the same event id on nostr.social there are only 933 sats donated
https://snort.social/e/nevent1qqsp2cz6ehckfv3dm098uffcj0rjc4ge22jahvsmyk57mfxayc9wvhspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcra0x43
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 30 Aug 2023
Oh shit, I trusted and didn't verify.
Thanks for your service, sir. Here are some sats.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @guts 30 Aug 2023
933 sats is still good
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @blocktock 30 Aug 2023
LOL. That is most definitely a bug with Primal
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @AllCatsAreEvil 30 Aug 2023
Seems there was another one where they don't validate nip-05 properly
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 30 Aug 2023
Damnit!
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Natalia 31 Aug 2023
Yesterday, someone shared a tool to manipulate the data on Primal, so many people were doing it.
I think one of the good ways to verify is the comments vs. zaps ratio, e.g. one post with millions of zaps, yet 2-5 comments do not make any sense.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 1 Sep 2023
Rookie mistake on my part.
Oops.
reply