pull down to refresh
related posts
988 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 31 Aug 2023
I don't know much about their underlying methods, but I assume they are statistical. Statistical methods are generally not admissable as legal evidence except in narrow circumstances: https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/statistics-legal-evidence.
Moreover, I highly doubt Chainanalysis has statistical models of high quality as it would require a sufficiently large dataset both with behavioral data and "ground truth". It's the ground truth part that I doubt they have any high quality data for. e.g. Knowing with certainty that two wallets are controlled by the same individual; knowing the identity of individuals connected to the same wallet; etc.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 31 Aug 2023
That should map onto this case, but it seems like the primary evidence the prosecution is using (at least based on the podcasts I've listened to in the case.
reply