pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @BTCMiner OP 2 May 2022 \ on: Letter from the Bitcoin Community to the Environmental Protection Agency | Bitcoin Mining Council bitcoin
Data Centers & Power Generation Facilities
- Are not the same
- Bitcoin mining facilities are Data centers NOT power generation facilities
- Data centers emit ZERO pollutants
- Bitcoin miners emit ZERO pollutants
- Bitcoin miners emit ZERO carbon
- The eWaste issue is FAKE
reply
Here's an article in Decrypt about this:
The document outlines eight specific “misperceptions” initially highlighted in the April 20 letter from House Democrats.
Saylor, Dorsey, Other Bitcoin Advocates Send Letter to EPA Rebutting House Democrats' 'Misperceptions' - Decrypt
https://decrypt.co/99200/saylor-dorsey-other-bitcoin-advocates-send-letter-epa-rebutting-house-democrats-misperceptions
reply
And an article in Bitcoin Magazine:
Michael Saylor, Jack Dorsey, Fidelity Investments, and others belonging to the Bitcoin Mining Council (BMC) gathered to author an open-letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) refuting misconceptions of bitcoin energy consumption as it relates to mining.The letter penned by the BMC is a response to another letter sent on April 20, 2022 that states a need for regulatory actions against bitcoin mining and other cryptocurrencies that use proof-of-work consensus models. The primary signatory for the letter sent on April 20 was Jared Huffman and was signed by another 22 sitting members of congress.The letter from the BMC outlined many misconceptions that were detailed in Huffman’s letter.
Michael Saylor, Jack Dorsey Pen Letter To EPA Refuting Bitcoin Energy FUD
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/michael-saylor-jack-dorsey-pen-letter-to-epa-refuting-bitcoin-energy-fud
reply
And from BTC Times:
Michael Saylor and Jack Dorsey Crush Bitcoin Mining Concerns With Letter to EPA
https://www.btctimes.com/news/michael-saylor-and-jack-dorsey-crush-bitcoin-mining-concerns-with-letter-to-epa
reply