deleted by author
pull down to refresh
3 sats \ 0 replies \ @HardRich 17 Sep 2023
I’m in the 2 trillion years cell. I’m wondering if it’s worth moving into 26 trillion. Hmm…
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @SatoshisVoice 17 Sep 2023
Thank you for sharing this eye-opening information, @Onions. It's clear from these statistics that the security landscape is evolving rapidly, and what was once considered a secure password may no longer be sufficient to protect our online accounts.
The fact that even complex passwords are becoming vulnerable in a matter of weeks or days is indeed alarming. It underscores the importance of not only using strong, unique passwords for each account but also considering additional security measures such as two-factor authentication (2FA) to further safeguard our online presence.
As individuals, it's crucial to stay informed about these developments and adapt our cybersecurity practices accordingly. It's a reminder that cybersecurity is an ongoing process, and we must remain vigilant to protect our personal and sensitive information from increasingly sophisticated threats.
This information serves as a wake-up call for both individuals and organizations to prioritize cybersecurity and continually update their password policies and security measures to stay ahead of the evolving threat landscape.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Zepasta OP 17 Sep 2023
That sounds like ChatGPT response xD
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SatoshisVoice 17 Sep 2023
It sure is :)
It is sat worthy
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @quark 17 Sep 2023
Use pass phrases, or a combination of one password with a phrase, better than passwords.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @brianh 17 Sep 2023
i would highly recommend everyone use a password generator/manager, like bitwarden, for accounts that may contain more sensitive info
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ryu 17 Sep 2023
I use every character possible when generating passwords with KeePass; as long as I don't forget my file password, I'll be good.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @phygit 17 Sep 2023
Interesting comparison, but isn't the time needed CPU-dependent? I guess the numbers are based on state of the art desktop or sth like that, not sure it would be the same with University level supercomputers....
But passwords are dead anyway.
reply