Marx was important. He explained capitalism in a way nobody had yet, and his ideas were an important tool for subsequent economists and thinkers to develop a better understanding, and build better models. Most take the mention of Marx as a grand ideological position. I don't. His ideas simply get added to the mosaic of economic intelligence through the centuries, and it gives us all a richer understanding. Things as old as that, preserved through writing (this can include music) don't survive at large in the global consciousness if they have no value.
Yes, he explained capitalism in a way that no one had, because he was ascribing demiurgic creative power to market economics that, he claimed, were necessarily exploitive and alienated man from his true socialist nature. Wrong, wrong, deadly and wrong.
His analysis adds nothing of value. Its based on a hyperreality that doesn’t exist.
reply