I'm sure there's some cognitive bias at play (lol is there a "seeking gratitude" bias?) - and I certainly wasn't glad it never happened when I wanted it to happen - but it forced me to be resourceful and learn some things a harder way.
The hard way of learning things tends to have side lessons that aren't easily taught. You get ahead slower but you can end up with more tools.
deleted by author
reply
There was a time when working at google was a huge status thing (a pretty reliable marker for being good and paid well) ... still is but vanishing.
reply
deleted by author
reply
I saw the original. Our deletes are truly permanent. We do not store what has been deleted or what something was before it was edited.
reply
deleted by author
reply
one day I must verify this though, still on my todo to clone your repo and poke around, but fml too much other stuff to deal with at the moment, lol :)
Relevant lines where you can see we overwrite the item content. But don't trust us, verify for yourself. I actually prefer when people don't trust us. :)
But sometimes I wonder if being OSS is actually enough. How can we proof that this is actually the code that is running in the backend?
reply
But sometimes I wonder if being OSS is actually enough. How can we proof that this is actually the code that is running in the backend?
I don’t know how to accomplish that. That thought crossed my mind as well
reply
Of the named biases, maybe it is a form of a status quo or loss aversion bias. I'm surprised there isn't a named bias for often faulty reappraisals.
reply