Thanks for the summary, I didn't know it goes back that far, will need to do some more research on this when I have some free time

Hopefully one day people won't feel like their tie to wealth is land and the enforcement of the nation-state, and if people have wealth that is not tied to the government they can make choices to stay and support a certain movement or leave with their wealth

Maybe it's wishful thinking, I don't know, I just feel like a better distribution of resoures through hard money makes a lot of these collective movements far less important when the individual can act not that they will always, some will always choose to follow but at least theirs an option