The history of Bitcoin and altcoins has shown that the overwhelming, long-term, non-speculative, market demand is for the straightforward use-cases of secure store-of-value and cheap and convenient medium-of-exchange, along with a smaller niche occupied by Monero’s enforced privacy5 use-case.
He completely skips over the market demand for smart contracts/defi. There's clearly demand and product/market fit there, whether most bitcoiners like it or not.
There is demand for all those things. But there hasn't been much consistent, long term, demand. What there has been is a lot of hype that tends to die down as people move onto the next thing.
reply
It's very often the case that Uniswap alone collects more fees than bitcoin itself:
reply
...and uniswap is a market for defi stuff on Ethereum. That isn't closely related to the problem drivechains is trying to solve, as it's about many different currencies/tokens rather than a single common currency.
reply
I'm just pointing out that there is clearly a lot of demand for defi/smart contracts.
reply
What are these charts based on? Is it the rolling average over a month?
reply
It's just the last 24 hours and the the seven day average.
reply
"Why would anyone want paved roads with stop lights ? The history of transportation shows an overwhelming demand for mud trails and horse ties."
  • Peter Todd.
reply
I'm on Peter Todds side on this.
I don't think this demand is organic - at least largely. The demand is inorganic in a sense that people use it as a gimmick for the sake of using it as a gimmick.
reply
And yet during a bear market there are smart contracts that can collect more in fees than bitcoin itself on a daily basis.
reply