I think this unproductive.

It doesn't matter if the Wallstreetjournal is wrong or right about Hamas funding their terrorism with "crypto". Like who cares if they did or did not or which sums were moved.

What does matter is that this argument isn't an argument against Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a neutral and permissionless (thus censorshipresistant) money. It's neutral. Like a hammer or like spoon and fork are neutral.

Nobody uses Hamas using forks as an argument to ban cutlery worldwide - neither should this matter about Bitcoin. It shouldn't even be a discussion.