He has been a lightning detractor for awhile. I think it is great everyone is discussing lightning's potential flaws and shortcomings so that they can be addressed or competing protocols with different solutions can be created. Only problem I have is bitcoiners who are concerned about lightning succumbing to shitcoiner tropes like lightning is broken, will never work, no one uses it, that shitcoiners use to shill their tokens/protocols. Lightning is clearly not a scam. Many of us are using it everyday without issue. Calling it a scam is unproductive and just fuels the shitcoiners narratives and keeps people in "crypto" for all its false promises.
crap misleading article
I'm reading only FUD
In your opinion why can these be dismissed as not serious?
I'm calm about Lightning's problems. It's a young protocol. I know that we can solve this type of problem even without doing soft forks.
He has been a lightning detractor for awhile. I think it is great everyone is discussing lightning's potential flaws and shortcomings so that they can be addressed or competing protocols with different solutions can be created. Only problem I have is bitcoiners who are concerned about lightning succumbing to shitcoiner tropes like lightning is broken, will never work, no one uses it, that shitcoiners use to shill their tokens/protocols. Lightning is clearly not a scam. Many of us are using it everyday without issue. Calling it a scam is unproductive and just fuels the shitcoiners narratives and keeps people in "crypto" for all its false promises.
Nice way to put it. Agree with you !!🙏
To call it a scam, is only going to hurt his own credibility. Lightning's issues are fixable. This might just be a Roger Ver moment.
agree