pull down to refresh

For me, the best answer in the list of answers, that you kindly linked, comes from the primary source - Satoshi.
Here Satoshi's answers Mike Hearn's question on this by writing,
I wanted something that would be not too low if it was very popular and not too high if it wasn't. It'd be interesting to see the working for this. In some sense the number of coins is arbitrary as the nanocoin representation means the issuance is so huge it's practically infinite. It works out to an even 10 minutes per block: 21000000 / (50 BTC * 24hrs * 365days * 4years * 2) = 5.99 blocks/hour I fudged it to 364.58333 days/year. The halving of 50 BTC to 25 BTC is after >210000 blocks or around 3.9954 years, which is approximate anyway based on >the retargeting mechanism's best effort. I thought about 100 BTC and 42 million, but 42 million seemed high. I wanted typical amounts to be in a familiar range. If you're tossing around >100000 units, it doesn't feel scarce. The brain is better able to work with >numbers from 0.01 to 1000. If it gets really big, the decimal can move two places and cents become the >new coins.
reply
I thought I read somewhere that people thought there was an off-by-one error, and that the number was supposed to be 42m, which is a significant number from HHGTTG.
This would make a lot of sense to me, but who knows.
reply
TL;DR ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
reply
down for maintenance 👨‍🔧 👻
reply