pull down to refresh

Craig Wright's Satoshi-cosplaying days may be coming to curtain close

There are fewer big names in tech and Bitcoin circles than Jack Dorsey, co-founder of Twitter and Block Inc.
When Dorsey saw that Wright was personally naming and suing a dozen lead devs of Bitcoin Core for $5.4bn in an English High Court case, he knew it was time to step in. The existential threat to Bitcoin and to those who develop it by someone who allegedly pretends to be Satoshi was too much. He stepped in and funded the devs' legal expenses with others creating the Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund.
In July, attorneys defending the devs filed their papers claiming that Wright has a history of fraud.
Wright attempted to have the evidence of his fraud withdrawn.
In October 2023, the High Court allowed the case against Wright to be amended to use Wright's alleged fraudulent evidence from the past to be used against him.
The evidence now details 50 instances of forgery in evidence that Wright is relying on in court. Here are some of the main ones:
• Metadata showing the documents that Dr. Wright claims were written in 2008 were edited with software (Grammarly, MathType, OpenOffice.org, Code2Flow) and fonts (Calibri Light and Nirmala UI) that didn’t yet exist (e.g., ID_000525, ID_000227, ID_000260, ID_000536, ID_000554).
• Metadata showing that Satoshi Nakamoto’s name had been replaced with Wright’s name on the Bitcoin White Paper, by editing it around 2019 using Adobe software (e.g., ID_000538).
• Edited text to refer to Bitcoin in the future tense “to make the document appear as if it was created at a time before Bitcoin was created” (e.g., ID_000227).
After the defense published the evidence online, Twitter users began to point out the strong evidence against Wright. This Twitter user mentioned: COPA's counsel Bird & Bird contacted the Chinese manufacturer of the "BDO August 2007 meeting minutes" paper, turns out that this design was only produced starting November 2009.
Another Twitter user added Here's a pre-release bitcoin.exe with "Copyright 2008 Dr Craig Wright" in the About Bitcoin dialog box— Craig Wright. It's been hex-edited to change Satoshi Nakamoto to Craig Wright in the About dialog, it has a 2010 timestamp and the checksum matches the real bitcoin.exe — COPA.
See all of the 50 pieces of evidence against Craig Wright at:
Thanks for assembling this. I periodically wonder how it's going.
I also wonder: if CW has proven, repeatedly, to be a fraud, is there really nothing that can be done to make him pay for it? As far as I can tell, 100% of CW-related legal activity is waiting passively for CW to do something, and then trying to get the case to take into account his history of fraud.
If I had a history of breaking into houses and then suing people, claiming that they had actually broken into my house, couldn't someone fund a lawsuit to have my ass thrown into jail for breaking into houses?
IANAL (can you tell?) but ffs, is this really the best the system can do? Is there no way to go on the offensive vs this piece of shit for lying in court a zillion times, and ruining people's lives with his lies?
reply
I also wonder: if CW has proven, repeatedly, to be a fraud, is there really nothing that can be done to make him pay for it? As far as I can tell, 100% of CW-related legal activity is waiting passively for CW to do something, and then trying to get the case to take into account his history of fraud.
The COPA case is a lawsuit against Craig Wright to pre-emptively (basically) get him declared as not Satoshi. That lawsuit is not "passive".
But beyond that even if you win a lawsuit against Craig how do you get him to actually pay up? He claims to not have any assets that can be seized. That may be a lie. But the Florida case has been dragging on for ages trying to collect $140 million from him without success.
Realistically he owes far more money than he could possibly have. So the best we will all be able to do do is be able to seize his assets and garnish his wages for life. At great expense.
reply
Where did he get the ballz... what a schmuck... I wonder why no one has hit him with the shovel yet...
reply
I always wondered how he could get away with all his fake evidence, trial after trial. I guess he felt empowered by it and didn't expect to find someone to stop him. Jack's been a bless for all his victims but the community support has been huge. I think all his bullshit has made us stronger. We're all Satoshi - except Craig Wright.
reply
How all he can do is dress up as Satoshi on October 31st, the day the whitepaper was released
reply
No more Faketoshi's, bless. Wonder what will happen to the @satoshi Xitter account after all this.
reply
deleted by author
reply