deleted by author
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 7 Nov 2023
My guess is yes.
reply
145 sats \ 0 replies \ @evanbaer 7 Nov 2023
When a pay-per-share mining pool (eg almost all of them except for Braiins) has a bad luck streak, they must do payouts to their customers from a reserve fund rather than coinbase tx's from newly mined coins. Could be that.
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @Saxtheowl1 7 Nov 2023
thats mine I tought I was on testnet sorry ;)
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @antic 7 Nov 2023
If you withdraw with Cash App via the 24 hour / zero fee method, they join your transaction with several hundred others. I'm not sure I've seen one this large yet, usually it's more like a pool of 3-5 BTC split 200 ways or so.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Zepasta OP 7 Nov 2023
But why are all the transactions with the same amount of sats? And why over-pay fees by so much? Doesn't make sense.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @antic 7 Nov 2023
I bet it's River. I haven't heard of anyone else re-using keys, but I heard in an interview with the guy from there that they ONLY use bitcoin addresses that they know they can send bitcoin from (re-using). This transaction left some BTC behind and the source that populated it also has funds leftover. It seems like that kind of behavior since River's whole model is that you buy bitcoin and they send it to your own wallet. So that would track with all of these tiny transactions going out of it--people buying $50 worth of BTC and getting it sent to self-custody.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @antic 7 Nov 2023
certainly looks like either an exchange, pool, or mixer... 🤷
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitByBit21 7 Nov 2023
Fat fingers?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @okpj 7 Nov 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Murch 7 Nov 2023
Looks like a mining payout
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @adexmakai4211 7 Nov 2023
That could game transaction on Bitcoin.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @benthecarman 7 Nov 2023
I'm guessing it is for ordinals
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Murch 7 Nov 2023
To P2PKH addresses? ^^
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @benthecarman 7 Nov 2023
Ah good point, yeah that's weird
reply