"The price of .com registrations is lower than it should be, therefore any good name you might think of is always already taken by some domain name speculator. Fortunately, it's standard for open source projects to be .org."
A correction of the article as well:
"However, the spokesperson did not specify how it was providing support to measure the use of bitcoin and crypto in the country."
Should instead read:
"However, the spokesperson did not specify how it was providing support to measure the use of bitcoin in the country."
As El Salvador has not adopted crypto as legal tender. Just Bitcoin.
Ah bitcoin.com, the shitcoin pushing website. Even when Bitcoin.org was first established Satoshi noted:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=88.msg806#msg806
In regards to "Who is bitcoin.com"
"It's unrelated. There wasn't anything there when I started.
"The price of .com registrations is lower than it should be, therefore any good name you might think of is always already taken by some domain name speculator. Fortunately, it's standard for open source projects to be .org."
A correction of the article as well:
"However, the spokesperson did not specify how it was providing support to measure the use of bitcoin and crypto in the country."
Should instead read:
"However, the spokesperson did not specify how it was providing support to measure the use of bitcoin in the country."
As El Salvador has not adopted crypto as legal tender. Just Bitcoin.
Otherwise, the article was still informative.