10 sats \ 1 reply \ @Onions 18 Nov
Beutiful website. But i didnt quite understand.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @owleyedapprentice 18 Nov
it seems like another version of pinterest, which i'd be into.
reply
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @okpj 18 Nov
Im all for the modernization of Web Rings. The centralization of content discovery (and search, for that matter) makes all content more susceptible to censorship and manipulation.
Web Rings were ultimately killed by Yahoo.
Cool concept, interested to see what happens with it.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 18 Nov
Where does the site talk about web rings?
reply
428 sats \ 1 reply \ @okpj 18 Nov
That was just an inference I made based on “Curators” — the site is actually pretty sparse on information and it’s possible I misunderstood. I imagine it would be like
Curator A: I found these links/content interesting. I also found Curator Bs links/content interesting.
Am I misunderstanding?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 18 Nov
Oh I don’t know I could find anything conclusive. I’ll have to google for content rings
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinosphere 19 Nov
That much marketing and no features list makes me very wary. I doubt this project will even get finished.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @StackerKnacker 19 Nov
Totally agree with you , it was all hat and no cattle .
reply