1046 sats \ 4 replies \ @OT 20 Nov \ on: Dreaming about CoinJoin at protocol level bitcoin
I remember Peter Todd talking about this (think it was on bitcoin takeover pod).
It would be hard to coin join over a certain amount. Imagine someone sending 1000 bitcoin, there would need to be a HUGE pool to match these tx.
Then the other problem would be that these "decoy" TX will be taking up a lot of block space. It will be expensive & harder to get into a block.
I like the idea, but I think having a large liquidity pool that you can use to coin join & collaborative TX would be best. Imagine if samurai, wasabi all used join market together like a happy family, we'd have the cheapest CJ as competition does its thing.
write
preview
42 sats \ 3 replies \ @anon 20 Nov
Man, with just few wisdow words you made my dream a nightmare 🤢 Anyway I've to totally agree with your points cause you're absolutely right expeciallt about block space and price to get into a block. Sad is I have had a hard wake up.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @stackeraw 21 Nov
Dont give up. Creative people brings sometimes breakthrough nobody could imagine. remember Albert eindstein about Imagination. Someday you will hit it big. Look at this artikel If it will give you a push in right path
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/einstein-famous-quote-misunderstood/
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 21 Nov
I think it would require at least a softfork. It might be hard to get consensus on something like this. Maybe if chain analysis gets perfected, then everyone might agree
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 21 Nov
Haha, yeah I liked the idea after hearing PT mention that one time. There might be a way to do it, but I haven't heard it yet.
reply